We once consider the Sun a planet , and it took find Uranus to make up one’s mind that moons should really be their own category of affair . These are all the stead in our solar organisation that were once planets — but now have far more worthy name .
Whenthe Ptolemaic framework of an solid ground - centrical existence held sway , planets were anything that cheat in the sky independently of orderly virtuoso . That covered the five naked - eye seeable planets , but also the most glaringly obvious candidates for , “ Which of these are not like the others ? ” ever : the Moon and the Sun . Under this definition , Earth was clear not a planet since all the planet orbit around it .
Ptolemaic model of the geocentric universe as instance in the sixteenth hundred .
The Sun kept its planetary status even after we figured out the other planets orbited it : the Tychonian model of the solar systemkept the Earth in the center of the Solar System with the Sun in orbit around it and Mercury , Venus , Mars , Jupiter , and Saturn whirl around the asterisk like demented moons . The Sun was finally break asthe Copernicus model of the Solar System gained sufferance in the 17th centuryand we reluctantly concede that we were the ones on a major planet revolve the Sun , not the other path around .
besides , the Moon was also finally demoted — but , before that happened , it picked up a lot more companionship .
The main moonshine of both Jupiter and Saturn briefly joined the list of planets before helping remold our views of solar organisation dynamics . The four Galilaean moons of Jupiter — Callisto , Ganymede , Europa , andIo — joined the list of planets after their discovery in 1610 . The five main moons of Saturn gradually join the tilt with their discovery — Titanin 1655,IapetusandRheain 1671 , andTethysandDionein 1684 .
observation of Jupiter ’s four largest moons . Image credit : Galileo Galilei
This detonation of lilliputian planets orbiting self-aggrandising planets led to the creation of a whole new concept : moonlight . With a unparalleled term all their own ( and the final removal of our own lunar month from planet - status ) , scientist were able to start speak about these miniature worlds in a manner separate from their larger like - yet - clear-cut companions . By the 18th century , the remotion of moons andthe breakthrough of Uranusbrought the satellite reckoning to six .
Amusingly , keeping these worlds not planets has repeatedly reemerged in later redefinitions of the term . Ganymede is both the Solar System ’s largest moonlight and the only one ( so far ! ) with grounds of a magnetised study , while the massive Titan has an atm and complex open moral force .
What is Ceres , anyway ? Image credit : NASA / JPL - Caltech / UCLA / MPS / DLR / IDA
In 1801 , Giuseppe Piazzi incidentally discovered Ceres . Consideringwe’re still baffled on how to define iteven witha space vehicle in area , it ’s not surprising its discoverers added Ceres to the major planet tilt . Today we alternate between calling it the largest asteroid , the only dwarf satellite in the main asteroid belt , or that eldritch affair over there that ’s similar yet unlike from everything else we ’ve found in our solar system .
Not long after finding Ceres , astronomers start finding a whole slew of similar object in the same part of space while looking for a “ missing satellite ” between Mars and Jupiter foretell by a now - discredit possibility . Between 1845 and 1851,Pallas , Juno , Vesta , Astraea , Hebe , Iris , Flora , Metis , Hygiea , Parthenope , Victoria , Egeria , Irene , and Eunomia all joined the list of planets in our Solar System . They quickly picked up a unique name — asteroid , but were treated as yet more major planet ( or perchance the shatter aftermath of a satellite ’s wipeout ) in observation criminal record .
Is Vesta orotund enough to be a major planet ? mental image credit : NASA / JPL - Caltech / UCAL / MPS / DLR / IDA
The new asteroid even take on those coolheaded undivided - symbolization alternate shorthand notation for relief of reference , although the growing leaning made the fresh symbols less elegant than their earlier predecessors . This crowded namespace for Modern symbols was indirectly what drive the conclusion to perhaps reclassify these new Earth .
Annoyed by the complexness of the newer symbols , Johann Franz Encke published his 1854 guide to astronomic objects by streamlining the symbol to everything post - Vesta as but a number in a Mexican valium . The alternating notation quickly gain popularity and touch off an unintended event in how the new discoveries were treated — some publication now listed them in numerical order - of - discovery alternatively of distance from the sun , while others put them in a extra subsection isolate from other worldwide news .
Astronomical symbols as of 1850 . Image credit : Johann Franz Encke
The transition to separating asteroids from the satellite was slow , atrocious , and inconsistent . The Nautical Almanac and Astronomical Ephemeris listed asteroid observations as “ Minor Planets , chemical element of ” from 1841 until 1853 , when it rearranged all the Modern discoveries with the more traditional lean of planets . German publishing started using Kleine Planeten ( “ bantam planets ” follow the notational system switch in 854 , with the Astronomische Nachrichten classify them as a subcategory of major planet from 1861 to 1932 . In France , the Paris Observatory started pull “ petites planetes ” from the main list in 1866 , although Pallas , Juno , andVestadid double - duty as both members of the list of main planets and as a preface to the asteroid index until 1868 .
Excerpt from The Annual of Science Discovery for 1850 . Image credit : David A. Wells
Meanwhile , the U.S. Naval Observatory could n’t decide what to do . They listed the objects as “ asteroids ” until 1868 , then “ minor planets ” until 1892 , switched back to “ asteroid ” for a few year , prompt on to “ minor planet ” in 1900 , and finally square off on “ asteroid ” in 1929 . In sharp contrast , the Royal Greenwich Observatory keep all the new objects classify under , “ Observations of the Sun , the Moon , and the Planets ” until 1905 .
Pluto and Charon might be the first binary satellite system . mental image credit : NASA / JHUAPL / SWRI
By now , you ’re getting the picture that the level of Pluto ’s planetary position is far from unparalleled . It ’s the most recent physical object to be adopted into the lexicon , joining the lean of planets at its uncovering in 1930 , and it ’s also the only property to suffer that status in recent class . While it ’s a popular complaint to yammer that Pluto was demoted , we’re much happier to consider it the greatest eccentric lesson in whole new compartmentalisation of worlds — dwarf planet , Plutoid , Plutino , and the dominate cooperator of the first binary satellite organization .
Pluto ’s massive moon Charon never made it to full major planet - status , but as the largest moon in proportionality to its host , it ’s mucking up sorting by afford a new , related disputation : Where do you draw the line between lunation and binary nanus major planet ?
With the advent of new technology , the early 2000s led to a burst of discovering new worlds on the immobilize fringes of our solar system . Each young world concisely carry the monikerPlanet Xor the10th planet , only to have the title hijack byanother , new find .
The arrow indicates the progress of Sedna across the sky . Image mention : NASA / Caltech
In 2003 we spottedSedna . It is just three - quarters the sizing of Pluto , but on an even more distant and lopsided orbit . From its current close approach of but 13 billion kilometer ( 8 billion miles ) , the ball of rock and ice will swing out to ten time the distance at a stupefying 130 billion klick ( 84 billion miles ) over its 10,500 - class orbit .
While it quickly realize the nickname of the tenth planet orthe 2nd red planet , Sedna never formally made it onto the tilt of official planets in our solar system . Instead it became the first of thetrans - Neptonian Objects , and the first contender for anOort Cloud object .
The interaction between Eris and its moon Dysnomia quickly distinguished the new world as more massive than then - planet Pluto . persona credit : NASA / ESA / M. Brown
In 2005 , we ran into the same problem again , but this time withEris . The newest globe was another aloof rockball of or so the same dimensions as Pluto but more massive . for sure if Pluto was a planet , Eris had to be one , too ! Although it certainly carried the tentative classification of major planet during initial observation and reports , Eris never officially made the listing . or else , it spark the now - infamous debate amongst the International Astronomical Union to create a scientifically - ground definition of planets to deal with these raw worlds before we were overwhelmed in a inundation of discovery .
The original dwarf planets have quickly been bring together by unexampled admirer . Image credit : IAU
The creation of the midget planets make out just in time : soon Sedna and Eris and the reclassify Ceres and Pluto were joined by the find ofHaumeaandMakemake . Now we have awhole cadre of candidates for dwarf satellite statusif we could just catch up with formally recognizing them !
The key proposal of marriage revolve around an emerging definition establish on intrinsical property : anything self-aggrandizing enough to havegravity shape an object into a spherewas a planet . There ’s only one problem : nature is n’t very good at creating a light bounds between spherical , and almost spherical . sop up a line on how spherical was spherical enough was a key challenge that stumped planetary scientists and astrophysicist during the2006 International Astronomical Union ’s debate on redefine planets . Steven Soter pointed out inWhat is a major planet ? :
[ D]oes gravity eclipse the form of a body if the cross - section deviates from hydrostatic counterbalance by 10 % or by 1 % ? Nature allow no untenanted crack between spheroidal and nonspheroidal anatomy , so any boundary would be an arbitrary choice .
Meanwhile , Mike Brown mocked that swear exclusively on roundness createda Leave No Iceball Behind scenario . The act ofround - ish asteroid , Trans - Neptonian objects , andKuiper Belt Objectsis tremendous : our list of planets in the Solar System could ’ve easily jumped to 50 overnight with more being bring all the time .
None of these are planets : the Sun and Moon [ top left ] ; Vesta ; Callisto ; Tethys ; Ceres [ middle left wing ] ; Titan ; Iapetus ; Ganymede ; Pluto [ bottom left ] ; Rhea ; Io ; Dione . Image credit : NASA / Mika McKinnon
The final definition of a major planet is that an object must be in orbit around the Sun , spherical , and monumental enough to dominate its area . Although this is in some fashion arbitrary , it work well enough at excluding moon , asteroids , comet , and the roseola of raw Kuiper Belt object . Although many people are distressed that this disputation eventually lead to Pluto lose its erratic status in favour of joining the new category of nanus planets , it salve us a repeat of the asteroid walloping by clearly identifying a young family of objects before our old system was swamped into uselessness .
However , it did lead to a unexampled job : Is Earth actually still a planet , or arewe just flattering ourselves ?
Our current definition of a planet has a flaw : it only works for our Solar System . Under the definition of orbiting the Sun , not any star , theliterally hundredsofexoplanetsaren’t really planets at all . If we adjust the definition to be less globe - centric foralien solar systems , how many subcategories of planet are we in for ? Along with our ownterrestrial planets , gas giants , and ice monster , we ’ve foundhot Jupiters , mega - world , boiling - hot icy waterworlds , andgas giants bordering on igniting into stars ; you knowwe’re go to find even more perplexing worldsaswe keep looking .
Is a lightweight “ child Jupiter ” a planet ? Image credit : Danielle Futselaar / Franck Marchis / SETI Institute
That still leaves outrogue planets afloat in infinite , at least until they getcaptured by a nearby superstar . And what should we do about detached former - stars , utter stars that fizzle out into lumps of He ordiamond ? Orsub - brown dwarfsthat are almost but not quitebig enough for fusionand are insteadawkwardly enormous gas goliath ?
The debate over what is a major planet is long and on-going , evolving with our changing sympathy of the globe around us . It reflects how we prioritize the intrinsical property of a worldly concern and what we understand about the importance of circumstance and chronicle ofhow the world came to be . Our solar system might have just four planets and remnant rubble , or the planets might number in the 100 include asteroids , dwarf planets , and the Kuiper Belt Objects we ’ve yet to discover .
But one matter is certain : However the definition of a satellite changes next , someone is going to be angry about it .
[ When did the asteroid become minor planets?;Pluto and the ‘ Planet Problem ’ : Folk Concepts and Natural Kinds in Astronomy;The Eight Planets;Planetesimals To Brown Dwarfs : What is a Planet?;The Problem with Pluto : Conflicting Cosmologies and the Classification of Planets ]
adjoin the generator at[email protected]or follow her at@MikaMcKinnon .
asteroidsCeresMinor planetsPlutothe moonthe Sun
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , science , and acculturation news show in your inbox daily .
newsworthiness from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
