So your mamma bought you a written matter of Mad Max : Fury Road on Ultra HD Blu - ray for Christmas and you require to trifle it on your former ass non-4 K TV ? A seam of devices from HDfury makes it potential . Or at least , it used to .
On New Year ’s Eve , Warner Brothersfiled a complaintagainst LegendSky Tech Company . LegendSky owns a company that makes a turn of HDfury devices . It ’s a peripheral that allow you to act as HD material on non - HD devices . Unfortunately , it did that by clean out the High - Bandwidth Digital Content Protection ( “ HDCP ” ) that media companies put on their content .
In theircomplaint , Warner Bros. has two causa against the HDfury gadget . First , that it violates the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ( DMCA ) . secondly , that it falsely promote its product as being in some way approved by Warner Bros.
On the first numeration , Warner Bros. contends that a stripper — that is , a gimmick that “ strips ” encryption from a data source — is a violation of the DMCA . They also point to HDfury ’s own site whichstates , “ To the missive of the law ( the DMCA that is ) , a black loge that dispatch the HDCP encryption to tolerate you to employ a monitor that does not patronise HDCP is illegal . ”
And that ’s largely correct . The DMCA makes it illegal to break or overreach any protection measure copyright bearer put on their work . It also makes it a offence to sell or import any equipment which has a primary function of doing that . Anything that rip a protect videodisc or Blu - Ray or fail an code flow violates the DMCA .
The DMCA does n’t care if the intent of pause the encoding is legal . The only mechanism for recognizing that there can be legal reasons to infract the DMCA prohibition era is the triennial exemption procedure ( which we ’ve covered in depth ) . The exemptions allow certain people to separate encryption for sealed aim . documental filmmakers who meet the exemptions condition could , in hypothesis , use the HDfury to get accession to a copy of HD cloth for their movie .
The HDfury website goes on to say — and this part is left out of the Warner Bros. complaint : “ However many civil rights counsellor say [ using a stripper to transfer HDCP encoding to utilize a non - HDCP - supporting monitor ] violates fair usance rights . ”
Which could be true . In 1984 , the Supreme Court rule in Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios , Inc. ( AKA the “ Betamax grammatical case ” ) that using VCR to record show to find out after was n’t a copyright infringement and was fair use . You could make an analogous argument that using a stripteaser to watch something you legally have the right to see on a monitor you also own legally is also fair consumption . It ’s machine shifting rather than sentence shifting . Of course , there was no DMCA in 1984 .
That statement has beentriedand has provenunsuccessful .
It is really , really operose to get around the DMCA ’s ant - circumvention provisions . Save an exemption , the law is n’t equivocal . And HDfury ’s site is proper that this butts up hard against fair use , which allow people to use fabric without permission or defrayment for certain purpose . The DMCA arrive at it well-nigh unacceptable for the great unwashed who have a sound rightfulness to a certain habit by blocking access code to the material . As always , the DMCA is a protector of company that hold copyrights and not fairish use .
What that means for the consumer is that there will never be a effectual way to make your old television act new media . If you get a new Blu - ray musician but all you have is an sure-enough Coyote State TV , guess what ? You ’re not buy an HDfury to make them talk to one another . You ’re buy a new TV .
[ Ars Technica ]
Top prototype : HDFURY IV S Advanced Kit / HDfury.com
connect with the generator at[email protect ] .
EncryptionWarner Bros.
Daily Newsletter
Get the dependable tech , science , and culture news show in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , return to your present .
You May Also Like
